• Facebook
  • Twitter
x

MARK KERRISON | Photojournalist

  • Live News Feed
  • Slideshows
  • About
    • About
    • Data Protection
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
Show Navigation
Cart Lightbox Client Area

Search Results

Refine Search
Match all words
Match any word
Prints
Personal Use
Royalty-Free
Rights-Managed
(leave unchecked to
search all images)
Next
{ 1319 images found }
twitterlinkedinfacebook

Loading ()...

  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Steve Valdez-Symonds, Amnesty UK Refugee and Migrant Rights Programme Director, speaks outside the Home Office during a protest by campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-023.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Steve Valdez-Symonds, Amnesty UK Refugee and Migrant Rights Programme Director, speaks outside the Home Office during a protest by campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-008.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protest outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-025.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protest outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-020.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. A banner used by campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protesting outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-024.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Samson Adeola and Daniel, former clients of the Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens (PRCBC), join campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC outside the Home Office to hand in a letter calling on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-014.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Daniel (l) and Samson Adeola (c), former clients of the Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens (PRCBC), join campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC outside the Home Office to hand in a letter calling on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-022.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Daniel, a former client of the Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens (PRCBC), joins campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-016.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Samson Adeola, a former client of the Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens (PRCBC), joins campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-019.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Samson Adeola, a former client of the Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens (PRCBC), joins campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-011.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protest outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-013.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protest outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-015.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. A wall used by campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protesting outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-007.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protest outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-006.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. A campaigner from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network protests outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-002.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. A wall used by campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protesting outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-018.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Daniel (c) and Samson Adeola (r), former clients of the Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens (PRCBC), join campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC outside the Home Office to hand in a letter calling on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-001.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. A campaigner from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC outside the Home Office calls on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-009.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Samson Adeola, a former client of the Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens (PRCBC), joins campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-004.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. A campaigner from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network protests outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-003.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protest outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-021.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. A campaigner from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network protests outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-005.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. A campaigner from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network protests outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-012.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. Campaigners from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network and PRCBC protest outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-010.jpg
  • London, UK. 25 November, 2019. A campaigner from Amnesty International UK's Children's Human Rights Network protests outside the Home Office to call on the British Government to stop selling children's rights. Currently, the Home Office charges £1,012 for citizenship applications, including for children living in poverty or local authority care, whilst the cost of processing an application is £372. Thousands of children with rights to British citizenship are prevented from claiming their rights due to excessive fees.
    Childrens-rights-not-for-sale-017.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Sara Callaway of Women of Colour in the Global Women's Strike addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-032.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Poet Zena Edwards addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-033.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-041.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-036.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-024.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-035.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. A speaker addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-018.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. A speaker addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-037.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade, Jerry Amokwandoh and Tim Crosland (l-r) pose outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-017.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade, Jerry Amokwandoh and Tim Crosland (l-r) pose outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-039.jpg
  • Weyman Bennett of Stand Up To Racism addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-025.jpg
  • Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-004.jpg
  • Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-028.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Esther Stanford-Xosei of Stop The Maangamizi Campaign addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-016.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Esther Stanford-Xosei of Stop The Maangamizi Campaign addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-038.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Sara Callaway of Women of Colour in the Global Women's Strike addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-040.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-027.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-022.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-021.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-029.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. A speaker from Colombia addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-012.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-043.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Banners are pictured outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal against the UK government on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-026.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-031.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. A banner is pictured outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal against the UK government on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-013.jpg
  • Poet Zena Edwards addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-042.jpg
  • Poet Zena Edwards addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-005.jpg
  • Poet Zena Edwards addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-009.jpg
  • Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-010.jpg
  • Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-030.jpg
  • Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-002.jpg
  • Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-006.jpg
  • Jerry Amokwandoh (r) addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-019.jpg
  • Adetola Onamade, Jerry Amokwandoh and Tim Crosland (l-r) pose outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-001.jpg
  • Adetola Onamade (l) and Jerry Amokwandoh (r) prepare to address climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Onamade, Amokwandoh and Marina Tricks) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-011.jpg
  • Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-003.jpg
  • Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-014.jpg
  • A banner is pictured outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal against the UK government on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-020.jpg
  • Banners are pictured outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal against the UK government on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-007.jpg
  • London, UK. 1st July, 2022. LGBT+ and human rights activist Peter Tatchell joins other Gay Liberation Front (GLF) activists at a march to mark the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-038.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Jerry Amokwandoh (l) and Adetola Onamade (r) stand outside the Royal Courts of Justice after an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Amokwandoh, Onamade and Marina Tricks) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-008.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Jerry Amokwandoh stands outside the Royal Courts of Justice after an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Amokwandoh, Marina Tricks and Adetola Onamade) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-023.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade stands outside the Royal Courts of Justice after an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Onamade, Marina Tricks and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-015.jpg
  • Protesters with a banner and Rainbow Pride flag assemble to take part in a London Trans+ Pride march from the Wellington Arch to Soho on 9th July 2022 in London, UK. London Trans+ Pride is a grassroots protest event which is not affiliated with Pride in London and which focuses on creating a space for the London trans, non-binary, intersex and GNC community to come together to celebrate their identities and to fight for their rights.
    London-Trans+-Pride-004.jpg
  • London, UK. 1st July, 2022. LGBT+ campaigners join Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans marking the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-055.jpg
  • London, UK. 1st July, 2022. LGBT+ and human rights campaigners join Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans marking the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-052.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-006.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-012.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-011.jpg
  • London, UK. 26th March, 2019. Hannah Phillips of the Arab Organisation for Human Rights addresses human rights campaigners from several different groups including Stop The War Coalition and Campaign Against the Arms Trade protesting opposite Downing Street against British arms sales to Saudi Arabia used to wage a 4-year war in Yemen. According to charity Save The Children, an estimated 85,000 children under the age of five may have died from acute malnutrition since the war began in 2015 and 14 million Yemenis are believed to face the risk of famine; according to the United Nations, millions of citizens have been displaced, over 56,000 Yemenis have been killed and the country is facing the ‘world’s worst humanitarian crisis’.
    Yemen-Forgotten-War-007.jpg
  • London, UK. 26th March, 2019. Hannah Phillips of the Arab Organisation for Human Rights addresses human rights campaigners from several different groups including Stop The War Coalition and Campaign Against the Arms Trade protesting opposite Downing Street against British arms sales to Saudi Arabia used to wage a 4-year war in Yemen. According to charity Save The Children, an estimated 85,000 children under the age of five may have died from acute malnutrition since the war began in 2015 and 14 million Yemenis are believed to face the risk of famine; according to the United Nations, millions of citizens have been displaced, over 56,000 Yemenis have been killed and the country is facing the ‘world’s worst humanitarian crisis’.
    Yemen-Forgotten-War-016.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-017.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-008.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-010.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-015.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-005.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-016.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-002.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-001.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-009.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-003.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-013.jpg
  • London, UK. 26th March, 2019. Hannah Phillips of the Arab Organisation for Human Rights addresses human rights campaigners from several different groups including Stop The War Coalition and Campaign Against the Arms Trade protesting opposite Downing Street against British arms sales to Saudi Arabia used to wage a 4-year war in Yemen. According to charity Save The Children, an estimated 85,000 children under the age of five may have died from acute malnutrition since the war began in 2015 and 14 million Yemenis are believed to face the risk of famine; according to the United Nations, millions of citizens have been displaced, over 56,000 Yemenis have been killed and the country is facing the ‘world’s worst humanitarian crisis’.
    Yemen-Forgotten-War-024.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-014.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-004.jpg
  • London, UK. 9th April 2019. Human rights activists from Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), Amnesty International UK, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam hold a vigil outside the Royal Courts of Justice before the hearing by the Court of Appeal of CAAT’s appeal against a High Court judgment in 2017 which permitted the UK Government to continue to export arms to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen. The UK has licensed £5 billion of arms to the Saudi military since the attacks on Yemen began in March 2015.
    CAAT-arms-Saudi-Yemen-007.jpg
  • London, UK. 26th March, 2019. Hannah Phillips of the Arab Organisation for Human Rights addresses human rights campaigners from several different groups including Stop The War Coalition and Campaign Against the Arms Trade protesting opposite Downing Street against British arms sales to Saudi Arabia used to wage a 4-year war in Yemen. According to charity Save The Children, an estimated 85,000 children under the age of five may have died from acute malnutrition since the war began in 2015 and 14 million Yemenis are believed to face the risk of famine; according to the United Nations, millions of citizens have been displaced, over 56,000 Yemenis have been killed and the country is facing the ‘world’s worst humanitarian crisis’.
    Yemen-Forgotten-War-019.jpg
  • London, UK. 1st July, 2022. Songwriter and broadcaster Tom Robinson stands alongside LGBT+ rights activist Peter Tatchell during a march to mark the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-043.jpg
  • London, UK. 1st July, 2022. Songwriter and broadcaster Tom Robinson stands alongside LGBT+ rights activist Peter Tatchell during a march to mark the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-054.jpg
  • London, UK. 1st July, 2022. Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans including Peter Tatchell (c) mark the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-042.jpg
  • London, UK. 1st July, 2022. Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans including Peter Tatchell (c) mark the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-062.jpg
  • LGBT+ campaigners join Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans marking the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park on 1st July 2022 in London, United Kingdom. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-027.jpg
  • LGBT+ campaigners join Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans marking the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park on 1st July 2022 in London, United Kingdom. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-022.jpg
  • LGBT+ campaigners join Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans to mark the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park on 1st July 2022 in London, United Kingdom. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-005.jpg
  • London, UK. 1st July, 2022. LGBT+ campaigners join Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans including Peter Tatchell to mark the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-048.jpg
Next