• Facebook
  • Twitter
x

MARK KERRISON | Photojournalist

  • Live News Feed
  • Slideshows
  • About
    • About
    • Data Protection
    • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
Show Navigation
Cart Lightbox Client Area

Search Results

Refine Search
Match all words
Match any word
Prints
Personal Use
Royalty-Free
Rights-Managed
(leave unchecked to
search all images)
Next
{ 182 images found }
twitterlinkedinfacebook

Loading ()...

  • London, UK. 21 January, 2023. Trans rights activists attend a protest opposite Downing Street. The protest was organised by London Trans Pride following the UK government's decision to use Section 35 of the Scotland Act to block Scotland's Gender Recognition Reform Bill which would have made it easier for trans people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) in Scotland.
    Trans-rights-GRR-bill-protest-022.jpg
  • London, UK. 21 January, 2023. Trans rights activists march through central London following a protest outside Downing Street. The protest was organised by London Trans Pride following the UK government's decision to use Section 35 of the Scotland Act to block Scotland's Gender Recognition Reform Bill which would have made it easier for trans people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) in Scotland.
    Trans-rights-GRR-bill-protest-035.jpg
  • (EDITORS NOTE: Image contains profanity) Trans rights activists march through central London after a protest outside Downing Street on 21 January 2023 in London, United Kingdom. The protest was organised by London Trans Pride following the UK government's decision to use Section 35 of the Scotland Act to block Scotland's Gender Recognition Reform Bill which would have made it easier for trans people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) in Scotland.
    Trans-rights-GRR-bill-protest-011.jpg
  • Trans rights activists gather at Marble Arch after marching through central London from a protest opposite Downing Street on 21 January 2023 in London, United Kingdom. The protest was organised by London Trans Pride following the UK government's decision to use Section 35 of the Scotland Act to block Scotland's Gender Recognition Reform Bill which would have made it easier for trans people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) in Scotland.
    Trans-rights-GRR-bill-protest-015.jpg
  • Tombstones brought to Trafalgar Square by activists from AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) London, a diverse and non-partisan international grassroots political group working to end the AIDS pandemic, for a mass die-in to mark World AIDS Day (WAD) on 1 December 2022 in London, United Kingdom. ACT UP London are calling for collective national action against government policies which are forcing the closure of HIV/AIDS education, prevention and support services. World AIDS Day is an international day dedicated to raising awareness of the AIDS pandemic caused by the spread of HIV infection and mourning those who have died of the disease.
    ACT-UP-London-AIDS-die-in-007.jpg
  • Tombstones brought to Trafalgar Square by activists from AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) London, a diverse and non-partisan international grassroots political group working to end the AIDS pandemic, for a mass die-in to mark World AIDS Day (WAD) on 1 December 2022 in London, United Kingdom. ACT UP London are calling for collective national action against government policies which are forcing the closure of HIV/AIDS education, prevention and support services. World AIDS Day is an international day dedicated to raising awareness of the AIDS pandemic caused by the spread of HIV infection and mourning those who have died of the disease.
    ACT-UP-London-AIDS-die-in-023.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-041.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-036.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-024.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-035.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. A speaker from Colombia addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-012.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. A speaker addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-018.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-043.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. A speaker addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-037.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade, Jerry Amokwandoh and Tim Crosland (l-r) pose outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-017.jpg
  • Weyman Bennett of Stand Up To Racism addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-025.jpg
  • Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-010.jpg
  • Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-030.jpg
  • Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-028.jpg
  • Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-002.jpg
  • Adetola Onamade, Jerry Amokwandoh and Tim Crosland (l-r) pose outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-001.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Esther Stanford-Xosei of Stop The Maangamizi Campaign addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-016.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Esther Stanford-Xosei of Stop The Maangamizi Campaign addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-038.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Sara Callaway of Women of Colour in the Global Women's Strike addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-032.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Poet Zena Edwards addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-033.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-022.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-021.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-029.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Banners are pictured outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal against the UK government on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-026.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade, Jerry Amokwandoh and Tim Crosland (l-r) pose outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-039.jpg
  • Poet Zena Edwards addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-042.jpg
  • Poet Zena Edwards addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-005.jpg
  • Poet Zena Edwards addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-009.jpg
  • Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-004.jpg
  • Jerry Amokwandoh (r) addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-019.jpg
  • Adetola Onamade (l) and Jerry Amokwandoh (r) prepare to address climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Onamade, Amokwandoh and Marina Tricks) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-011.jpg
  • Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-003.jpg
  • Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-014.jpg
  • A banner is pictured outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal against the UK government on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-020.jpg
  • Banners are pictured outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal against the UK government on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-007.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Sara Callaway of Women of Colour in the Global Women's Strike addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-040.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Tim Crosland, Director of Plan B.Earth, addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of him, Plan B.Earth and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-027.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Jerry Amokwandoh addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-031.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. A banner is pictured outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal against the UK government on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Adetola Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-013.jpg
  • Adetola Onamade addresses climate activists outside the Royal Courts of Justice before an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Marina Tricks, Onamade and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis on 25th November 2021 in London, United Kingdom. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-006.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Jerry Amokwandoh (l) and Adetola Onamade (r) stand outside the Royal Courts of Justice after an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Amokwandoh, Onamade and Marina Tricks) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-008.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Jerry Amokwandoh stands outside the Royal Courts of Justice after an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Amokwandoh, Marina Tricks and Adetola Onamade) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-023.jpg
  • London, UK. 25th November, 2021. Adetola Onamade stands outside the Royal Courts of Justice after an appeal on behalf of Plan B.Earth, Tim Crosland and three young British citizens (Onamade, Marina Tricks and Jerry Amokwandoh) with family in West Africa and the Americas who claim that their human rights are being breached by the UK government’s failure to act decisively on the climate crisis. The three students have asked for a judicial review of government actions to cut national carbon emissions and have argued that UK government action, or inaction, disregards their rights to life, family life and not be discriminated against under Arts 2, 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act.
    Global-Majority-vs-UK-Gov-015.jpg
  • London, UK. 1st July, 2022. LGBT+ campaigners join Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans marking the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-055.jpg
  • Peter Tatchell, veteran LGBTI+ and human rights campaigner, flanked by Linda Riley and Phyll Opoku-Gyimah, leads thousands of LGBTI+ protesters along Whitehall on the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-005.jpg
  • London, UK. 18th December, 2018. Activists from around the UK, accompanied by Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party, drop a banner from Westminster Bridge in solidarity with the Stansted 15 and all migrants on International Migrants Day. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Westminster-banner007.jpg
  • London, UK. 18th December, 2018. Activists from around the UK, accompanied by Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party, drop a banner from Westminster Bridge in solidarity with the Stansted 15 and all migrants on International Migrants Day. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Westminster-banner004.jpg
  • London, UK. 18th December, 2018. Activists from around the UK, accompanied by Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party, drop a banner from Westminster Bridge in solidarity with the Stansted 15 and all migrants on International Migrants Day. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Westminster-banner006.jpg
  • London, UK. 18th December, 2018. Activists from around the UK, accompanied by Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party, drop a banner from Westminster Bridge in solidarity with the Stansted 15 and all migrants on International Migrants Day. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Westminster-banner001.jpg
  • London, UK. 18th December, 2018. Activists from around the UK, accompanied by Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party, drop a banner from Westminster Bridge in solidarity with the Stansted 15 and all migrants on International Migrants Day. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Westminster-banner003.jpg
  • London, UK. 18th December, 2018. Activists from around the UK, accompanied by Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party, drop a banner from Westminster Bridge in solidarity with the Stansted 15 and all migrants on International Migrants Day. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Westminster-banner002.jpg
  • London, UK. 18th December, 2018. Activists from around the UK, accompanied by Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party, drop a banner from Westminster Bridge in solidarity with the Stansted 15 and all migrants on International Migrants Day. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Westminster-banner005.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. A man stands outside the Home Office in protest against the conviction the previous day using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-017.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Protesters gather outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-013.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Margot Leicester, mother of one of the Stansted 15, addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against their conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-004.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Members of the Stansted 15 listen to a mother addressing protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against their conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-002.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Protesters gather outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-010.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Ash Sarkar, Senior Editor at Novara Media, addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-014.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. A speaker from the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-015.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Sian Berry, co-leader of the Green Party, addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction of the Stagnated 15 using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-008.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Clive Lewis, Shadow Treasury Minister for Sustainable Economics, addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-011.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Diane Abbott, Shadow Home Secretary, addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-012.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. A man stands outside the Home Office in protest against the conviction the previous day using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-005.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. One of the Stansted 15 addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against their conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-006.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. One of the Stansted 15 addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against their conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-001.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Protesters gather outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-007.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. A speaker addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-009.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Diane Abbott, Shadow Home Secretary, addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-003.jpg
  • London, UK. 11th December, 2018. Diane Abbott, Shadow Home Secretary, addresses protesters gathered outside the Home Office to protest against the conviction using an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 of the Stansted 15 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying immigrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017. The judge directed the jury to disregard evidence put forward in their defence that their acts were intended to stop human rights abuses.
    Stansted-15-Home-Office-016.jpg
  • LGBT+ campaigners join Gay Liberation Front (GLF) veterans marking the 50th anniversary of the first UK Pride march in 1972 by retracing their steps from Charing Cross to Hyde Park on 1st July 2022 in London, United Kingdom. The commemorative march is intended to recapture the roots of Pride as a protest as well as a celebration of LGBT+ rights, contrasting with the depoliticisation and commercialisation of Pride in London, and to call for LGBT+ liberation both in the UK and around the world.
    UK-Pride-50th-anniversary-046.jpg
  • Trans rights campaigners take part in the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    MK-2021 Selection-007.jpg
  • Peter Tatchell, veteran LGBTI+ and human rights campaigner, takes a selfie with some of the thousands of LGBTI+ protesters taking part in the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-003.jpg
  • Peter Tatchell, veteran LGBTI+ and human rights campaigner, poses with a placard in Parliament Square before the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-040.jpg
  • Peter Tatchell, veteran LGBTI+ and human rights campaigner, is interviewed following the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-035.jpg
  • Peter Tatchell, veteran LGBTI+ and human rights campaigner, speaks in Parliament Square before the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-021.jpg
  • Peter Tatchell (l), veteran LGBTI+ and human rights campaigner leads thousands of LGBTI+ protesters up Regent Street on the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-034.jpg
  • A trans rights campaigner sits in Oxford Street to address thousands of LGBTI+ protesters taking part in the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-027.jpg
  • Trans rights campaigners take part in the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-026.jpg
  • Peter Tatchell, veteran LGBTI+ and human rights campaigner, leads thousands of LGBTI+ protesters along Whitehall on the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-013.jpg
  • Chelmsford, UK. 6th February, 2019. The Stansted 15 stand outside Chelmsford Crown Court before sentencing. They were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017.
    2019-image-selection-001.jpg
  • Chelmsford, UK. 6th February, 2019. The Right Revd Stephen Cottrell, Bishop of Chelmsford, addresses activists from around the UK gathered to show solidarity with the Stansted 15 before their sentencing at Chelmsford Crown Court. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017.
    Stansted-15-sentencing-014.jpg
  • A trans rights campaigner poses with a sign in front of the statue of Gandhi in Parliament Square before the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-011.jpg
  • Thousands of LGBTI+ protesters pass along Regent Street on the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter. (
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-017.jpg
  • Thousands of LGBTI+ protesters take part in the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-022.jpg
  • LGBTI+ protesters pose in Parliament Square before the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-020.jpg
  • A trans rights campaigner sits in Oxford Street in front of thousands of LGBTI+ protesters taking part in the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-049.jpg
  • Trans rights campaigners take part in the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-001.jpg
  • Windsor, UK. 13th June, 2022. Masked Stop the War Coalition activists act out the knighting of Sir Anthony Blair during a protest outside Windsor Castle against the awarding of the honour to the former Prime Minister who they believe should be held accountable for war crimes as a result of his controversial role in the Iraq War. Sir Anthony Blair was knighted during a private audience with the Queen last week and is being installed as a member of the Order of the Garter during a ceremony at Windsor Castle.
    20220613-No-Knighthood-for-Tony-Blai...jpg
  • Chelmsford, UK. 6th February, 2019. Dan Glass of ACT UP London addresses activists from around the UK gathered to show solidarity with the Stansted 15 before their sentencing at Chelmsford Crown Court. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017.
    Stansted-15-sentencing-027.jpg
  • Chelmsford, UK. 6th February, 2019. Dan Glass of ACT UP London addresses activists from around the UK gathered to show solidarity with the Stansted 15 before their sentencing at Chelmsford Crown Court. The Stansted 15 were convicted on 10th December of an anti-terrorism offence under the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 following non-violent direct action to try to prevent a Home Office deportation flight carrying precarious migrants to Nigeria, Ghana and Sierra Leone from taking off from Stansted airport in March 2017.
    Stansted-15-sentencing-017.jpg
  • LGBTI+ protesters hold Progress Pride and Transgender Pride flags as the first-ever Reclaim Pride march arrives in Hyde Park for a Queer Picnic on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-004.jpg
  • A LGBTI+ protester holds a Progress Pride flag as the first-ever Reclaim Pride march arrives in Hyde Park for a Queer Picnic on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-033.jpg
  • LGBTI+ protesters hold Progress Pride flags as the first-ever Reclaim Pride march arrives in Hyde Park for a Queer Picnic on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-015.jpg
  • Thousands of LGBTI+ protesters take part in the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-008.jpg
  • Thousands of LGBTI+ protesters pass along Regent Street on the first-ever Reclaim Pride march on 24th July 2021 in London, United Kingdom. Reclaim Pride replaced the traditional Pride in London march, which many feel has become too commercial and strayed from its roots in protest, and was billed as a People’s Pride march for LGBTI+ liberation. Campaigners called for the banning of LGBTI+ conversion therapy, the reform of the Gender Recognition Act, the provision of a safe haven for LGBTI+ refugees and for LGBTI+ people to be decriminalised worldwide and marched in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
    First-Reclaim-Pride-London-014.jpg
Next